Thursday, March 6, 2008
Let's Clarify
Though I referenced pregnancy in my last blog, I assure you all that I am most definitely not pregnant.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Italy 2008 - 5th Anniversary
About Me
Blogs we read
- Bairds
- Batemans
- Belnaps
- Bendheim's
- Britta
- Christina
- Clawsons
- Dana and Chase
- Davis
- Dixons
- Erards
- Ferraros
- Fongs
- French Family
- Gilmores
- Glenn E. Thomas Dodge
- Harris
- Hastings
- Hexbergs
- Housleys
- Jacobs
- Johnsons
- Johnsons (CA)
- Just Jenn
- Kelly King
- L. Family
- Larsons
- Larsons II
- Larsons III
- Lindgrens
- Mangrums
- Matsens
- Meiers
- Mortensens
- Odekirks
- Orvins
- Our Christmas List
- Papas
- Patricio's
- Patricios
- Rasmussen
- Reagan
- Redge Bendheims
- Reids
- Roneys
- Shwams
- Stockards
- Streiffs
- Tanners
- Tanners II
- Tanners III
- Tanners IV
- The Family Cookbook
- Vergaras
- Vichikovs
- Walburgers
- Wests
- Wheelers
- Williams
- Wrights
Luke
Joshua
3 comments:
Thank you for clarifying. Could you imagine having another one by the new year?!? I would be happy about it :)
I never understood why people looked at my funny each time I got pregnant after RJ. Then I looked at the slideshow of baby Luke. I guess pregnant when the bigger kids is only nine months is close together. Never occurred to me before. I was just feeling like this baby is going to feel like they're out in no man's land so far away from the sibling before.
Well Dang it! You'r kids are so cute, we can't wait to see the next one!!! I agree with Lori, I too would be happy about it!
Post a Comment